Rob Speer on 19 Jan 2002 03:42:06 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Ruling: CFJ272


On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 09:02:16PM -0500, Alex Truelsen wrote:
> CFJ 272 (Judge: Baron von Skippy)
> CFJ by Bean
> 
> Non-player entities are allowed to vote.
> 
> Analysis: The ruling on CFJ 251 specifies that "No rule specifies how a
> non-player entity should vote." Thus there is no rule forbidding the voting 
> of non-player entities. Thus by Rule 18, they may.

I didn't even notithe thith FJ.

The proponent could have quoted my whole analythith, as I had already
thtated why I believed Rule 18 didn't apply - voting is regulated by the
rules.

I really don't think Rule 18, or its equivalent in other rulethetth, was
meant to be a blanket "do whatever the heck you want unleth ith nailed
down really hard" clause. Thith is the firtht Nomic where I've theen
thuch a liberal interpretation.

Although ith not a proposal, I declare TheeEffJay 272 to be in Bad Thtyle.
-- 
Rob Thpeer