Doig, Gavin on 17 Jan 2002 15:26:59 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Moderation among the justi ce reform |
> Didn't platonism go out with the Ancient Greeks? > As a view of real life, perhaps. As a view of nomic? No. It's a good idea not to confuse the two. ;-) Platonism is pretty much a standard nomic viewpoint, largely because it just makes a lot more sense (for nomic). I'm not just making this stuff up as I go along; it's a shoulders-of-giants thing. Our rules *are* like inviolable laws of physics; rule 152 ensures that. In fact, the analogy (although remember that analogy != identity) with physical laws works well - the rules completely define the behaviour of everything *within the universe*. The universe, in this case, is the game state. Rule 10 is unnecessary because any entity defined solely by the rules cannot help but obey them, and players can't be made to do so (because we come from outside the universe of the rules). I can post English messages to public fora even with the sushi, or post 40 proosals, for example, and nothing can stop me. If I do, though, r152 kicks in, and any such actions I attempt never take place *within the game universe* because the rules don't permit them. You miss the point of the CFJ system. Yes, physical laws don't need courts to enforce them; that's not what the CFJ system does. It simply lets *us* know what has happened. We're chained up in the cave, looking at the shadows on the wall. Our records of the rules and gamestate are the shadows; the actual rules and gamestate are what cast the shadows; and the CFJ system is just what we use to interpret the shadows. Exactly as you describe - the physicals laws are just *there*, but our approximations to them sometimes have to be updated to reflect them better. The only problem with the Platonist interpretation is that it can lead to having to recalculate months worth of game if you miss an error in our view of the game for a long time, and that's what the statute of limitations is for. Platonism is more elegant, and much, much cooler. uin. Repeal rule 10! DISCLAIMER: This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("the intended recipients(s)") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is privileged, proprietary and/or confidential within the meaning of applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender of this message as soon as possible. The views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and may not necessarily be the views held by Azurgroup Limited
<<application/ms-tnef>>