Doig, Gavin on 15 Jan 2002 17:16:22 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Proposal: No Kickbacks (Ju stice, Administered Piecemeal)


Title: RE: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Proposal: No Kickbacks (Ju stice, Administered Piecemeal)

> It is my belief
> that the ruling on the CFJ should outline what has to be corrected in our
> mental represenatations (and the "official" ones) to bring them in
> accordance with what actually happened.
>
While I don't have the same philosophical objections to this, it'd need to be worded very carefully for me to not have similar pragmatic objections.

> >I don't think the statute of limitations works that well the way it's
> >currently written, but that's another story.
>
> I hate to be the civic promoter, but draft a proposal then!
>
I've been trying to work out how best to do so. I've got 1 more proosal free than I was expecting this nweek, since my proosal proosal passed. :-) But I have the sushi at the moment; while I don't think that stops me from doing anything, I'd like to unambigously establish that first.

> >In most cases, it's impossible to disobey the law; nomic laws aren't like
> >legal laws, they're more akin to physical laws (although they have a
> >strictly limited domain, as I'll argue in a CFJ I'm currently writing).
> >Similarly, CFJs aren't like the adversarial system of criminal justice;
> >they're more like an inquest, which attempts to determine what happened (or
> >some better example).
>
> Again, 100% correct.
>
> And as a point of personal preference... is the CFJ really the best way to
> go about that?
>
The CFJ's about the specific case of the sushi. And I'm by no means sure that it's true anyway... at least, depending on how I word it... hmm.

uin,
thinking.


DISCLAIMER:
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("the intended recipients(s)") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is  privileged, proprietary and/or confidential within the meaning of applicable  law. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender of this message as soon as possible.

The views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and may not necessarily be the views held by Azurgroup Limited