| Doig, Gavin on 9 Jan 2002 17:57:37 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Revision of 236 |
> _Judicial Rear View_
I think this would establish the (potentially somewhat dangerous, as has been pointed out) precedent that CFJs remain true until reviewed. I'd be much happier with simply adding something along the lines of "A CFJ shall be judged based upon whether its statement was true at the time it was submitted.", instead of the whole review process (except for appeals, which are a Good Thing).
uin.
DISCLAIMER:
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("the intended recipients(s)") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is privileged, proprietary and/or confidential within the meaning of applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender of this message as soon as possible.
The views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and may not necessarily be the views held by Azurgroup Limited