Re: spoon-discuss: Re: Call For Judgment

Rob Speer on 5 Jan 2002 07:31:12 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: Call For Judgment

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: Call For Judgment
From: Rob Speer <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 02:31:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201050317220.963-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <7rkc3uc0sl9mt9nnsaqvs340nthisvplqo@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201050317220.963-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.24i

> > "There is not a possibility of talking" indeed.
> 
> Yup.
> 
> In the meantime, I presume the judgement to be "False" but I'm not
> entirely sure. Plunder, if you can clarify that in a relatively
> unambiguous way, feel free.

It is like that.  That is the right side.  

-- 
Plunder Speer

References:
- spoon-discuss: Re: Call For Judgment
  - From: Antonio
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: Call For Judgment
  - From: David E. Smith

Prev by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: Call For Judgment
Next by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: Call For Judgment
Previous by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: Call For Judgment
Next by thread: spoon-discuss: RE: Hogging Bandwidth
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread