Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Call For Judgment

["Donald Whytock" <dwhytock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Gee...how do the concepts of "true" and "false" translate from Korean? :) (Vote Ruetay!)

BTW, John...I suggest you post to spoon-business or spoon-discuss, not both at once.  One's a named public forum for B Nomic business, the other's for casual discussion.

						Glotmorf

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 1/4/02 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Van Matre wrote:

>I hope Rob issues a judgement within the first 4 days, so we can
>experience the judicial wisdom dispensed by the Cursed Sushi of Babel.
>;-)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David E. Smith [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:45 AM
>> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: spoon-business: Call For Judgment
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Donald Whytock wrote:
>>
>> > Does the Administrator qualify as a Public Forum under rule
>> 28, since
>> > he is "reasonably accessible to all players"?  After all, anyone can
>> > email him. (Note that neither "forum" nor "accessible" is currently
>> > defined in the rules.)
>> >
>> > Specifically, is an action considered valid if submitted directly to
>> > the Administrator, as opposed to submitting it to spoon-business?
>> > Rule 31 seems to serve as precedent for conducting business through
>> > the Administrator.
>>
>> This is CFJ 218, assigned to Rob.
>>
>> ...dave
>>
>>