Donald Whytock on 4 Jan 2002 15:31:08 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: Now You See Me, Now you don't

On 1/4/02 at 3:21 PM Josh Utterback wrote:

>I would like to propose the following rule.  (I think this format
>conforms to 217)
>__Now You See Me, Now You Don't__
>{{Apend the following paragraph to the end of rule 205.
>Any player who is not already On Leave and who's Activity has decreased
>for two consecutive nweeks shall be placed onto Forced Leave.  In all
>other respects being on Forced Leave is identical to being On Leave.
>[[This way players that have disappeared from the game without telling
>anyone will be placed onto Leave and won't factor into the game until they
>choose to return.  Or until rule 206 kicks in and gets rid of them all

It should be "whose" rather than "who's".

Aside from that, do you want to make any allowance for proxies?  Otherwise, a player could give eir proxy to another player, then vanish into the wilds of Africa or the rubble of Manhatten, and never enter Forced Leave because eir vote is being cast every nweek for em.