spoon-discuss: Re: Jebus CFJ

[Antonio <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:37:24 -0800, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:34:18PM -0500, Glenn Overby II wrote:
>> Robin Lee Powell responds to the judgement by Chess:
>> 
>> >> Analysis:
>> >> 
>> >> I prefer referring to someone as 'Jebus' than having to refer to
>> >> them as 'Jesus'. 'Jesus' is a sacred name and shouldn't be taken
>> >> lightly;
>> >
>> >You've got to be fucking kidding me.
>> 
>> Chess doesn't appear to be kidding.  Whether or not prefacing the
>> statement with the word "Analysis" constitutes an oxymoron is left as
>> an exercise for the student.
>
>The 'n oxy' part is unnecessary.
>

???

why so?
I once used the boundless power of the judge to gain a win ( with the A
nomic ruleset ) that's why I though we'd get some better CFJ rules this
time around :)
--
Rivoluzione:
  \o_  (o      __)   ( /    |__     o_  _o/
   |   /\  __\o  \o   |   o/  o/__  (\   |
  / \ |\  /) |   ( \ /o) / |  (  (\  /| / \

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com