spoon-discuss: Oh, wait... that's tomorrow

["Doig, Gavin" <GDoig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

*sigh*

OK. All these changes to peoples' scores and names and so on are, I believe,
just as legal as the administrator recognising as proosals things which
clearly weren't - i.e., not at all legal (the things they attempted to
change are regulated by the rules) . I don't agree that the administrator
has any special ability to overturn the rules, or to act as a judicial
system. If we don't have a judicial system, we just don't have one.

The reason I attempted (it hasn't worked yet) to change my score (and Jesus'
name... my apologies if that caused any offence) was that if the proosals to
create a judicial system and to prohibit CFJs in the first NWeek pass, my
actions will become legal ("Such actions shall always be treated as if they
had been legal") after one NWeek.

I actually mistimed this - I mistakenly thought that voting came to an end
last night, not tonight, which wouldn't have left that much time for people
to change their votes on 117 to stop me (or from taking advantage of the
same loophole).

I change my vote on proposal 117 to No, and urge people to do the same.
Don't let THEM retroactively immanentize the eschaton!

uin.


DISCLAIMER: 
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("the intended
recipients(s)") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is
privileged, proprietary and/or confidential within the meaning of applicable
law. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have
received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please contact the
sender of this message as soon as possible. 

The views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and
may not necessarily be the views held by Azurgroup Limited