spoon-discuss: RFJ recognized

[Antonio <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:51:26 -0400, you wrote:

>Wait a minute, didn't The Kid make RFJ 47?
>I want a RFJ on the following statement, "The judgement on RFJ 47 is 
>invalid because the selection of The Kid as Judge violated Rule 236/1."
>
>Rule 236/1 states:
>"The following are excluded from serving as Judges on a Request for Judgment:
>
>      1. the Plaintiff
>      2. Judges previously recused from the Request
>      3. any one Player that the Plantiff requests be recused from the Request
>
>      If these exclusions leave no Players eligible to serve as Judge, 
>exclusions may be waived from highest-numbered to lowest until at least one 
>Player becomes eligible."
>
>The Kid made the Request for Judgement on May 10, 2001, and since there is 
>more than one Player in the game, he can never be selected as Judge.  Not 
>every eligible Player was selected, in addition, the previously recused 
>Judges must be selected again to judge before he can be considered.
>
>jeff

Recognized as RFJ N° 49 and assigned to Dave.


...Sending it to the business list too :|
-- 
zagarna
-- 
A.D.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com