spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ on the most recent ballot

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth "David E. Smith":
> I request an RFJ on this statement:
> 
> "The player known as Dave, as of one second past the end of nweek 26, owns
> three Rules."
> 
> Plaintiff's analysis:
> 
> Proposal 471/1 transferred ownership of all Rules to the Bank. So, this
> would seem to be a nice simple "FALSE" ruling, right?
> 
> But. (You knew that one was coming, didn't you.)
> 
> I cannot find any reference in the current Rules that defines the order or
> timing of how Rules come into existence.
> 
> I posit that all passed proposals take effect simultaneously; therefore,
> the three Rules which I would own as a result of Proposal 469/0 passing
> are in fact mine, and not included in the effects of 471.
> 
> This also means that PurpleBob owns 1 rule and Joerg owns 12 or so rules
> (I lost count somewhere in the middle of wading through P467/2), all per
> Rule 326/0.
> 
> Since it affects that player so heavily, under Rule 236/1 I request that
> Joerg NOT be assigned this RFJ.
> 
> Have a nice day.
> 
> ...dave

See R313/0.

-- 
J.