Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: why?

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth Josh:
> 
> Joel Uckelman sez:
> >Why did people vote against P400, P402, P403, or P408? I'm confused by 
> >this, since all made changes that I presumed from the lack of comment were 
> >non-controversial. Was it to gain points, prevent me from owning more 
> >Rules, because they were flawed, or for some other reason?
> 
> You did not Randal. Is that not sufficient reason?

You see, it's interesting that you bring that up, as there may or may not be a violation of that Rule going on right now, depending on its interpretation.

-- 
J.