spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: why?

[Daniel Chapman <Daniel.Chapman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Heh.  I'm more annoyed that I keep making proposals which other people
improve on, submit as a different proposal ... We should have some sort of
"ammend the current proposal" instead of submitting a new proposal.
Otherwise, we end up with two similar proposals by voting time and the
person who submitted the idea in the first place not only doesn't get
credit, but gets a failed proposal.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Uckelman [mailto:uckelman@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:32 PM
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: spoon-business: why?


Why did people vote against P400, P402, P403, or P408? I'm confused by 
this, since all made changes that I presumed from the lack of comment were 
non-controversial. Was it to gain points, prevent me from owning more 
Rules, because they were flawed, or for some other reason?

In any case, since the problems they address still exist (e.g., R346 is 
quite broken), I'm proposing the whole batch again, with the same text as 
before.

-- 
J.