Rob Speer on 16 Feb 2001 21:53:35 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Revision to P396 |
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 04:12:50PM -0500, Daniel Chapman wrote: > Only thing I see odd about allowing a player to add emself as a player, > which can later be rescinded, is that the player could add a good proposal, > no one notice that the player isn't a real player -- the player could be > removed from the roster (due to non-consent) but the items stick around, not > having been proposed by a player it could lead to a rule which isn't a rule, > etc. The player wouldn't be on the roster. In my rule the player makes an ordinary Motion to Add, and only becomes a player after consent is given. I just don't think it's necessary to make a "Newbie Player" class between Agent and Player. -- Rob Speer