Harrison, Andrew on 13 Oct 2000 14:19:55 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Judment on RFJ 20

<unsnip!> Therefore I rule the statement to be FALSE and since I am such a
good judge that I deserve a win.

> :) part of the stuff you snipped said that i judged my 
> reasoning to be soo good
> that I deserved to win the game: the order I issued was 
> precisley meant to
> "bring the game state into accord with the result of the Judgment."

May I refer you to:

Rule 237/0 : Judgments 

A Judge shall, within three days of eir selection, give one of the following
responses to the Request for Judgment to which e was assigned, accompanied
by analysis and Judicial Orders as appropriate: 

1. Refused: A Judge may refuse to hear the Request if it lacks a clear
Statement or is not germain to the game. 
2. True: The Statement is true. 
3. False: The Statement is false. 
4. Undecided: It cannot be determined at the time of the Judgment whether
the Statement is true or false.

Therefore your judgement was FALSE, anything else was analysis or Judicial

The Kid