0x44 on Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:41:02 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] I agree |
I disagree with the below-quoted determination as it was neither "Yes", "No", or "Maybe". I call for Determination on the following statement, "Hose is in violation of rule 22E4.3, for failing to make a determination that was truthful." I am It, but as the callee I recuse myself. The Burden of Determination falls onto Comex. I become It. I tag base, and call Time-Out. -- 0x44 On Monday, April 2, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Mike McGann wrote: > There is only one hat. > > My Jester's cap: > > http://b.nomic.net/wiki/User:Hose > > It is blue-green and it is on backwards. Nobody is in that hat except me. > > // Hose > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Elliott Hird < > penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)> wrote: > > > On 2 April 2012 02:03, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx (mailto:comexk@xxxxxxxxx)> wrote: > > > http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=2338927 > > > > > > It's a good thing we have a rule explicitly allowing people to repeat > > answers by posting objection.mrdictionary.net (http://objection.mrdictionary.net) links with supportive > > text. The determination passes, leaving only Hose's yet-to-be-made > > determination pending. > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx (mailto:spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx) > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx (mailto:spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx) > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business