Sean Hunt on Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:53:44 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] The current gamestates, as I understand them


no

I'm confused enough that I'm considering writing an alternate and slightly
more sensible initial set of rules before advertising the start of the nomic
elsewhere and then proclaiming a start.

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 17:32, Paul VanKoughnett <allispaul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've been lurking on this list for a while, and will probably actually
> join the game since you've started a new one.  But for now I'm just
> dropping in to say: in what way did the proposals state an explicit
> intention to modify only that document?  Presumably, they (implicitly)
> intended to modify two documents -- the two extant rulesets -- and one
> of those intentions automatically failed.
>
> --Paul
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Eric Stucky <turiski.nomic@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Haha, I think I like the new proposal more than "re-move law 4". Yes.
> >
> > > No outstanding proposals, since quotation marks aren't curly brackets.
> > Yeah, and while law 9 doesn't make it illegal, it probably makes it
> pretty useless.
> >
> > [ -Turiski ]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business