Re: [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 123a

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I answer CFI 123a TRUE, deferring to the arguments of the appellant. 
On Jul 27, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> FALSE. The player generally known as teucer does not have the name "Murphy" as
>> this name is already in use as a unique identifier for another player. If teucer
>> were to have the name "Murphy", that would violate the first paragraph of Rule
>> 2/0, "All game entities must have uniquely identifying names", which I interpret
>> to mean that all identifying names held by a player [[basically all names that
>> aren't titles]].
> 
> I appeal the above judgement. Arguments: While the judge is correct
> that "All game entities must have uniquely-identifying names", and
> this unambiguously means all identifying names held by players must be
> unique, the fact that something MUST happen does *not* mean that it
> does - merely that players who MUST do something are in violation of
> the rule in question. (See Rule 14.) Ergo, the MUST clause in Rule 2
> does not block me from becoming a player with the relevant name; it
> merely means that the other Murphy is breaking Rule 2. (I do have to
> specify a unique name when joining, but as I in fact specified four of
> them I should be good.)
> 
> - teucer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business