Jeff Gitchel on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:03:48 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] A Request (re: CFIs) |
-----Original Message----- From: Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 17:31:54 CDT Subject: [s-b] A Request (re: CFIs) I request that Players that are not assigned to Judge a CFI and are not the submittor, to please refrain from presenting arguments as though they are the submittor, as said arguments (for or against) may bias the assigned Judge. -.-.-.-.-.-. I assume you mean they shouldn't present arguments that can be accidentally read as being judgements. Good idea. But I think the only way for that to happen is if you codify the format of a real judgement so that it can be easily discerned from everything else. That seems easily done through a proposal, eh? -- Jeff Gitchel jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://turtlemoon.org twitter: gitchel _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business