Re: [s-b] The Nature of CFIs

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:11:03 +0000
> From: darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [s-b] The Nature of CFIs
> 
> Pursuant to CFI 112, I submit a CFI:
> {{
>   Statement to be considered:
>   {{
>     The answer given by the first judge is now invalid.
>   }}
>   Background:
>   {{
>     The Oracle assigned a Judge a CFI and that Judge answered
> it, but it was subsequently found that a script had assigned the CFI to
> a different Judge.
>   }}
> }}
> [[This layout is for ease of understanding. All of the text needs to be taken into account, but the CFI is on the statement "The answer given by the first Judge is now invalid.", rather than on the other sentence.]]
>


This is CFI 113. I assign CFI 113 to Judge Murphy. 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/
Do you have a story that started on Hotmail? Tell us now
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business