|
Craig Daniel on Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:03:20 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Definitely not a Bribe Proposal
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Definitely not a Bribe Proposal
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:03:15 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=klo7C2Bs142ROPenK9xS6QE9MDXMYgTrM+PS1zJuTG0=; b=k8MI7e25JNB+JsZQ8igxtICu2BvJu8DNWm4ArTZBEY9e876XJP+ug9OPcX3OiInpui QdNEApQfa72gUOdkJdk51/9j9TgaU/iHEF0iltQsJ/Hp112OGZOOhFfBH6rX0+2bmkLm NzOM1kQBwo9CjtB6WhyhAqVgmVCohEwluNgiE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=aEKRssjM5Rw4KGWefE4PcAhMH2/wl9yRBUDZH+EqIFzeoKN2HS1v/5IUCksyckV5KD SV7yOa7pKLfkVAvhTJnNEaxGh9bbCdfzwkpj4TLUoi1zn8VwXmZTqMNYT8WUeLo33FKX SPSTKd4Rx9s2vSwgS2DQaopKgLki4pWPQ9Ny0=
- In-reply-to: <SNT109-W4302D455EDDCB63E311625855F0@xxxxxxx>
- References: <850486.43957.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT109-W4302D455EDDCB63E311625855F0@xxxxxxx>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:58 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This may have no effect as it is between comment delimiters. It is ambiguous as Official Documents are not defined
> by the rules but I believe a proposal would count as an Official Document.
I submit a CFI: "A proposal has been submitted which, if adopted,
would award each player ten points."
I name Marr596 as the Defendant.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business