| Sean Hunt on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:20:25 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [s-d] Umm |
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:10 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Craig Daniel wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Kerim Aydin <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> "Defined" isn't defined either. ÂYou need to start from there. >> >> Or I could pretend to be playing with people who speak English. > > Or someone could CFI and the Oracle could assign it to a sane judge and we could put this all to rest. > > I CFI on "A player who forfeits ceases to be a player of B Nomic" Arguments: According to Rule 13/0, 'A player is any entity who is capable of passing the Turing test, consents to said designation as a player, has become a player in the manner described in the rules, and who consents to be governed by the rules. "Being" is a synonym for "player."'. I meet all the criteria (here is my assertion that I never refused consent to be designated as a player) therefore I am a player, irrespective of whether or not I have forfeited. -coppro _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business