Craig Daniel on Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:32:30 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] CFI 105

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:30 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I judge CFI 105 UNDECIDED, on the ground that the rules for which action comes first (Sheep Gnome Placement or
> Gnome Factory Activation) are ambiguous.

I appeal.

...I also note that the results of overturning a decision of UNDECIDED
are less than entirely clear about what it becomes next. Anybody want
to work out a refined appeals system?
spoon-business mailing list