|
Craig Daniel on Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:32:30 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: spoon-business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-b] CFI 105
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:32:22 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gWFWCj5vfx0V8vNnTQIay0309B/nGcyhBOnwH7VEecc=; b=Z6BuHLmyM4UGfkytEu70t6sJ97xm2P9lBZk/rjx+0vKmQxa2OpzYFvQOE5YiI5QMJN wWT1M5lPNPLLUMq6aO56pPAH85MgilvQN5+FtZSuj2qc5K6/ODsllMJGrTNdk8iYOq6J Vxae3+lHBoNhUkpS771imU/MNISAQsifb+3yU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dEQmS6t2+Bnid14rAnMF5H7h0BO5UEpr8W8v2xb54nFmyYI4gl8GZ5CS1hQrXIMv3m 5adgPbRCnFS/Rv34mf4+Q+eo4Wk6xYyB286430ulYCsbyTdLctfklIXiRcpc5Y+8XAOA X3bpUl3Q0FPXm2GQKPg7hNNQqCcaSOZJfAmRk=
- In-reply-to: <35467.13611.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <35467.13611.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:30 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I judge CFI 105 UNDECIDED, on the ground that the rules for which action comes first (Sheep Gnome Placement or
> Gnome Factory Activation) are ambiguous.
I appeal.
...I also note that the results of overturning a decision of UNDECIDED
are less than entirely clear about what it becomes next. Anybody want
to work out a refined appeals system?
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business