| Justin Ahmann on Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:52:02 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 103 |
I answer CFI 103 UNDECIDED. Argument: We can't tell whether the Plaintiff actually believed this. Even if we ask him, he might lie. Codae ________________________________ From: James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 4:40:58 AM Subject: [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 103 > Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:12:06 +0000 > From: darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [s-b] Ambassador Report > > CFI: I believe that this attempted action fails, on the grounds that there is no mechanism for B Nomic Sucking. Am I correct in this belief? > > --- On Sat, 19/12/09, Kenner Gordon <kennercat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Kenner Gordon <kennercat@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [s-b] Ambassador Report > To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Saturday, 19 December, 2009, 2:59 > > I intend, without 523 objections, to cause B Nomic to Suck. This is CFI 103. I assign CFI 103 to Judge Codae. _________________________________________________________________ Have more than one Hotmail account? Link them together to easily access both http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394591/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business