Kerim Aydin on Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:28:26 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] [Oracle] Judge assignments

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, 0x44 wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:46:16 -0800 (PST), Kerim Aydin
> <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, James Baxter wrote:
>>>>>  - I won't let you do that, Starfox!
>>>> I call for judgement on the statement, "The above-quoted text
>>>> constitutes an objection to JamesB's intent to initiate an emergency."
>>> This is CFJ 23.
>>>> * teucer has supported JamesB's most recent intent to initiate an
>> emergency.
>> As these are identical questions I defer to the earlier one and Judge
>> 0x44.
>> (If 0x44 doesn't judge for a few days, I expect to say false... "won't
> let
>> you do that" could be a threat to object as easily as it's an actual
>> objection).
> The text of your CFJ is "teucer has supported JamesB's most recent
> intent..."
> not that Marr hasn't objected.

Oops, lots of nested quotes in that sequence.  I answer TRUE.  "Consent" 
is close enough to "support" given the obvious context.


spoon-business mailing list