Re: [s-b] [s-d] [Oracle] Judge assignments

[Kerim Aydin <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, 0x44 wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:46:16 -0800 (PST), Kerim Aydin
> <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, James Baxter wrote:
>>>>>  - I won't let you do that, Starfox!
>>>>
>>>> I call for judgement on the statement, "The above-quoted text
>>>> constitutes an objection to JamesB's intent to initiate an emergency."
>>>
>>> This is CFJ 23.
>>>
>>>> * teucer has supported JamesB's most recent intent to initiate an
>> emergency.
>>
>> As these are identical questions I defer to the earlier one and Judge
>> 0x44.
>> (If 0x44 doesn't judge for a few days, I expect to say false... "won't
> let
>> you do that" could be a threat to object as easily as it's an actual
>> objection).
>
> The text of your CFJ is "teucer has supported JamesB's most recent
> intent..."
> not that Marr hasn't objected.

Oops, lots of nested quotes in that sequence.  I answer TRUE.  "Consent" 
is close enough to "support" given the obvious context.

-G.


_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business