| Charles Walker on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:34:07 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] I won't let B die! |
2009/11/30 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>: >> I intend, with the consent of B, to initiate an emergency because if no one wants to play B then something must be wrong with the >> game. > > I consent. > >> Â- I won't let you do that, Starfox! > > I call for judgement on the statement, "The above-quoted text > constitutes an objection to JamesB's intent to initiate an emergency." Which quoted text? Arguably 'I consent' doesn't constitute supporting the action, although 'I won't let you do that, Starfox!' is obviously more ambiguous. I CFJ on the following statements: * teucer has supported JamesB's most recent intent to initiate an emergency. * Marr has objected to JamesB's most recent intent to initiate an emergency. -- Charles Walker _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business