| Craig Daniel on Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:17 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009. |
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:47 PM, <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The proposals are: > > 1996 - No longer interested (Wooble) AI: 3 FOR - II is an unneeded Agoricism. > 1997 - Some players are more equal than others (C-Walker) AI: 3 FOR - same reason. > 1998 - We're all Cretans here (0x44) AI: 1 ABSTAIN > 1999 - Add reports to the MoM report (Walker) AI: 1 ABSTAIN > 2000 - Wooble is a CreTIN (Marr965) AI: 1 AGAINST - punishing people over their choice of proposal names is not in the spirit of this game so far, and I do not want to push B culture in that direction. Punishing them for *other people's* proposal names is like that, only also colossally stupid. > 2001 - First-class Cleanup (Walker) AI: 3 FOR - given that there are no non-first-class persons in the game unless something gets hilariously strange, this is useful cleanup. > 2002 - Umm... (coppro) AI: 3 AGAINST, though I approve of the pun. - teucer _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business