Re: [s-b] Resolving the Emergency.

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I deputize for the Oracle to award myself a Herb Gnome.

On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:07:44 +0000, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:50:48 -0400, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:52 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> As four days have passed, I RESOLVE this Emergency and select Wooble's
>>> Refresh Proposal as the victor. PRESENT was not a valid vote in this
>>> emergency, as PRESENT was not a Refresh Proposal in the Emergency, so
>> the
>>> only PEP to vote in this Emergency was 0x44 who voted for Wooble's RP.
>> 
>> I CFJ on: "The Emergency Decision was validly resolved."
> 
> I answer the above CFJ TRUE.
> 
> Rule 23 specifies that valid Decisions can only be initiated if they
> include an explicit list of valid voters or a description of the class of
> valid voter, a clear indication of the valid options on the decisions,
and
> the identity of the vote collector. Emergency Decisions fail to meet this
> definition explicitly in Rule 123. Emergency Decisions may be initiated
by
> any PEP and need only include the title, text, and author of a refresh
> proposal. Further, an Emergency Decision may be resolved by ANY PEP after
> four days have passed OR EACH PEP has cast a valid ballot on the
Decision.
> 
> 
> Emergency Decisions are not Decisions as they fail to meet the definition
> in Rules 23, 24, and 25. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business