Charles Walker on Wed, 2 Sep 2009 03:02:32 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 1994 / Pool Report |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Geoffrey Spear<wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This distribution of proposal 1994 initiates the Bn > Decision on whether to adopt it. The eligible voters for ordinary > proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic > proposals are the active first-class players, and the vote collector > is the Assessor. The valid options on each decision are FOR, AGAINST, > and PRESENT. > > NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE > 1994 O 1 1.0 C-walker Office Interest Indices > }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{ > > Proposal 1994 (Ordinary, AI=1.0, Interest=1) by C-walker > Office Interest Indices > > Replace the second paragraph of Rule 86 (Interest Index of Offices) with: > > A player CAN set an office's interest index without 2 > objections, or with the Consent of B. I deputize for the Assessor to send the following humiliating message: The voting period on the decision on whether to adopt proposal 1994 has been doubled. Wondering why? A measly TWO players voted on it. TWO. Congratulations to Tiger and myself for managing to type FOR, AGAINST or PRESENT. To the rest of you eligible voters, is this too much effort? Or do you consider yourselves above such a small distribution? Shame on you. Shame on you all. You have until the 8th of September to vote, or if 3 more of you manage to vote before then, I can end the voting period earlier. -- C-walker (Charles Walker) _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business