0x44 on Sun, 31 May 2009 08:31:21 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Ambassador's Report |
I OBJECT. - 0x44On May 31, 2009, at 4:26, Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 15:50 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Charles Walker <charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:As of my last message to spoon-business, the recognition of variousnomicshas been flipped. They will be informed of this. I intend, with BnConsent,to join Internomic II on behalf of B.Object.I forgot about this. There are currently two supporters and twoobjectors,so can I go ahead?No, you need a majority. I support. Now you can.Will do. I intend, with Bn Consent, to vote FOR this: http://internomic2.wikidot.com/forum/t-159549/protectorate -- C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business