Jonatan Kilhamn on Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:52:12 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-b] Answer to consultation 231


2009/4/8 Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I assign Consultation 231 to Priest Tiger.
Question: Did any of Billy Pilgrim, j, and the Blue Chromium Agreement vote
FOR any of Proposals 1913 or 1927?
Yes. The reasoning is that "AGAINST FOR", which was Billy's vote on
1927, should be considered two different votes, of which the last one
is counted.

For the record, all the three players/factions' last votes were
AGAINST 1913, FOR 1927.

spoon-business mailing list