|
Jonatan Kilhamn on Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:52:12 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
[s-b] Answer to consultation 231
|
- To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [s-b] Answer to consultation 231
- From: Jonatan Kilhamn <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:46:41 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WMpLTFUEnHrgnRuhSR2rKQcdoRDQxQ4jCQC2KV6PAYQ=; b=sNRwgQvVT1eA/E7b6Eb1Ttmbl2qF0TygYckwu/MCZkFQ7hmfB0hIV2BWTgGWe7heoF XH6qNY7AfQt1oDTsAee3xVuqqeCL2hVxoNbRc018KjN1TcgvMya/UUGrwI5hSgQGEj1I ZS04loToXzQXdvj8wiq8kX5QBvDKEI1zxbyuE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=tbsQ1qmX5SyhYmG+Kh1i9Lab+U/Y6ykdbUEVG0lsTqVkwWb4AHV/fF4LbMQbIL08uf Fx7WxBDmorPnYU5Z8XjKl24cvO3ACJjZ82gdJDVFAkaZ53LieusPSx5EaNFVsOp12sHE C/9QN0x4X101TVH4fSjMFmA06wEMAv6FsImvI=
TTttPF
2009/4/8 Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I assign Consultation 231 to Priest Tiger.
(
Question: Did any of Billy Pilgrim, j, and the Blue Chromium Agreement vote
FOR any of Proposals 1913 or 1927?
)
Yes. The reasoning is that "AGAINST FOR", which was Billy's vote on
1927, should be considered two different votes, of which the last one
is counted.
For the record, all the three players/factions' last votes were
AGAINST 1913, FOR 1927.
--
-Tiger
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business