[s-b] Consultation 225

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:00:30 -0700
> From: emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] BUS: [Cookie Jar] Report
> 
> Wooble wrote:
> 
> >> I submit the following Consultation, naming Marr965 as the Unbeliever:
> >> {{Are the Squares (1,1) and (2,2) Adjacent?}}
> >>
> >> Reasoning: they certainly would be in chess.
> 
> This is Consultation 225. I assign it to Priest JamesB.

 

I answer Consultation 225 YES.

Reasoning: The Rules state that a Player may enter an adjacent square. They do not specifiy whether they are refering to orthogonally or diagonally adjacent squares. Therefore I rule that both interpretations are valid.

 

I submit an Ocularity for Consultation 225:

{Append the following sentence to Rule 2-13:

{For the purposes of this rule, "adjacent Square" refers to any square neighbouring the original square either orthogonally or diagonally.}}

 

_________________________________________________________________
View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place – Learn more!
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business