| Warrigal on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:39:27 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Ballot for nweek 156 |
me tytytytypyfy On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I vote: > >> 1900 - What about 5th Era? (JamesB) > AGAINST. Remember, kids, voting AGAINST reduces public spending, > making your macks more valuable! > >> 1901 - Numbering (Wooble) > AGAINST, for the same reason as above. > >> 1902 - Clean up the judicial system (again) (Murphy) > FOR. > >> 1903 - GameBoard (0x44) > AGAINST. We had a game board. As far as I remember, nobody was ever > able to attack anyone. > >> 1904 - Back to business (ehird) > AGAINST. Eew. > >> 1905 - <untitled> (Marr965) > AGAINST. There are no squares. > >> 1906 - Checks and Balances (and some other stuff) (c-walker) > FOR. > >> 1907 - Precedence System (Wooble) > FOR. > >> 1908 - Emancipation and Stickiness (Wooble) > AGAINST. In general, we should avoid defining things, lest we find out > too late that the definition doesn't actually work. If we find that > the rules have been using a bit of boilerplate text, it may be useful > to come up with a definition to replace it; otherwise, it's just a > floating definition. > >> 1909 - Remove the Faction Exploit. (0x44) > I cast an vote FOR this proposal. > > --Warrigal > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business