Re: [s-b] [s-d] Artisan report

Ed Murphy on Sun, 8 Mar 2009 11:53:15 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Artisan report

To: B Nomic Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Artisan report
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:53:25 -0700
In-reply-to: <627253.38093.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <627253.38093.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Marr965 wrote:

> I require more evidence to answer the question, as it is not clear to me whether the Blueprint was created as a result of the Proposal that would have caused it to be created, or whether the MoG is responsible for creating Blueprints. I therefore request that the Oracle ZOT this Consultation, or reassign it.

I reassign Consultation 221 to Priest Sgeo.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- Re: [s-b] [s-d] Artisan report
  - From: M P Darke

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Artisan report
Next by Date: [s-b] Proposal: precedence system
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Artisan report
Next by thread: [s-b] Proposal: precedence system
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread