Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:37:35 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Reassignment of Consultation 203 |
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I assign Consultation 203 to Priest Wooble. I answer YES. Rule 5E10 says "To perform a Game Action, an Outsider must post a message to a Public Forum specifying that they are taking that action." I hold that this "must" establishes a necessary but not sufficient condition to perform game actions, and doesn't provide blanket possibility for doing something simply because doing that thing would be a Game Action were it possible. 5E57 does indeed allow a contract to be modified by any mechanism specified by the contract, but it does *not* allow any particular person to modify arbitrary contracts. Were it worded using the active voice as something like "any Player may/can modify a contract by performing actions specified in that contract", it might be legitimately argued that 5E57 creates the ability to perform any action specified in a contract. Using the passive voice, it does not have this effect, and the contract can only grant the power to modify it, not the power to perform the actions it says are necessary to modify it. -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business