[s-b] Consultation, collated

M P Darke on Sat, 7 Feb 2009 05:21:50 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-b] Consultation, collated

To: Nomic <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [s-b] Consultation, collated
From: M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 12:21:44 +0000 (GMT)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=aaXy11z/DQlACL9dkJ+w8flfc/mtpKM0w4QcCn52/IyTvMGK2eYj66ZOInszUxtyGAT4s73b7vwimMJdoxcYE+MVNwkkyzjF+YatjyiixiZAI21SYnH+mkpXwZroYxk127DsANpJpp4WvFnuQ2gz5oaabldreBaSs/Dxah4YQYA=;

Just for the record:
"
I submit a Consultation:
Are the contracts "Loose Interpretation
League" and "Strict Interpretation League" likely to create two warring
groups of Player (with possible pressure applied to non-contractees to
join one or the other)?
Unbelievers: All parties to the Contracts "Loose Interpretation League" and "Strict Interpretation League"
"



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-b] Consultation, collated
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-b] Consultation, collated
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: [s-b] Consultation... whoops
Next by Date: [s-b] Oh, and even though this message does nothing
Previous by thread: [s-b] Consultation... whoops
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] Consultation, collated
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread