Re: [s-b] A highly original contract

[M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I submit a Consultation:
Are the contracts "Loose Interpretation League" and "Strict Interpretation League" likely to create two warring groups of Player (with possible pressure applied to non-contractees to join one or the other)?
--- On Sat, 7/2/09, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [s-b] A highly original contract
To: "spoon-business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, 7 February, 2009, 1:03 AM

I create the following Contract and consent to be a party to it:

{The name of this Contract is the Strict Interpretation League.
Parties to this contract are known as Losers. Initially, comex is a
Loser.  Any person can become a party to this contract with the
consent of a majority of existing Losers. Any person who was not an
Enemy in the last 30 days can leave this contract at will. This
Contract can be amended by any Loser with the consent of three Losers
or all but two Losers, whichever is greater.

An Enemy is anyone who is in the Enemies List, which is the following:
{Warrigal, JamesB, Codae}. If an Enemy becomes a Loser, this Contract
amends itself to remove the Enemy from the Enemies List. Losers shall
not claim an answer made by an Enemy to be consistent. The Minister of
Questions, if he is a Loser, should not (but may) assign a
consultation regarding interpretation of the rules to an Enemy. Losers
should not (but may) vote for a non-Loser to be Minister of Questions.
 Losers should (but need not) name an Enemy as the Unbeliever to all
their consultations.

Losers shall not cause damage to other Losers unless they
simultaneously cause more damage to Enemies.}
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business