Re: [s-b] Consultation 202 on Early motnw Change

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I answer this Consultation (204, submitted by Wooble) YES.  I defer to the Supplicant's Reasoning, which is, IMHO,

{
Question: 

ARGUMENTS: Rule 5E36 defines thusly: Reasoning, meaning text that
clarifies the intent of the Consultation.

Unbeliever: 
}

Codae




________________________________
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:49:06 AM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation 202 on Early motnw Change

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oh, and please call your arguments "Reasoning" or I might not archive it.
> (Being under no obligation.)

I submit the following Consultation:
{{
Question: Is text included with a Consultation that clarifies the
intent of the Consultation Reasoning, even if it's not labeled as
such?

ARGUMENTS: Rule 5E36 defines thusly: Reasoning, meaning text that
clarifies the intent of the Consultation.

Unbeliever: Tyler
}}

-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business