Tyler on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:58:46 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation 199 on Game Docs vs. game docs


I claim this to be CONSISTENT.

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:33 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>
> > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:46:58 -0700
> > From: wisety@xxxxxxxxx
> > To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [s-b] Consultation 199 on Game Docs vs. game docs
> >
> > Consultation 199. I assign to Priest JamesB.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Elliott Hird <
> > penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > 17:47 < _0x44> Points of Order are not Game Documents, they are game
> > > documents.
> > >
> > > Consultation: {game documents are distinct from Game Documents}
> > > Arguments: No, just no.
>
> Answer: NO
> Reasoning: The're the same thing in English so, unless the Rule explicitly
> state otherwise, they mean the same. Unless you're a retarded monkey, of
> course.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Choose the perfect PC or mobile phone for you
> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/130777504/direct/01/
>  _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business