Tyler on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:58:46 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation 199 on Game Docs vs. game docs |
I claim this to be CONSISTENT. On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:33 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:46:58 -0700 > > From: wisety@xxxxxxxxx > > To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [s-b] Consultation 199 on Game Docs vs. game docs > > > > Consultation 199. I assign to Priest JamesB. > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Elliott Hird < > > penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > 17:47 < _0x44> Points of Order are not Game Documents, they are game > > > documents. > > > > > > Consultation: {game documents are distinct from Game Documents} > > > Arguments: No, just no. > > Answer: NO > Reasoning: The're the same thing in English so, unless the Rule explicitly > state otherwise, they mean the same. Unless you're a retarded monkey, of > course. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Choose the perfect PC or mobile phone for you > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/130777504/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business