Jay Campbell on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:50:46 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] motnw

I submit a consultation, "Did the motnw change today?" with an argument {

"To perform a dependent action, a Player must first announce their intent to perform that action as a Game Action. Between 2 and 4 ndays after the intent was announced, the action may be performed by the Player if..."

Even though in this case the motnw rule does not care about objections, the 2-to-4-nday waiting period still applies.

In fact, the final paragraph of 5E11, "All Players may Object or Support an action before it is performed as a Game Action," suggests that objections may be filed and prevent the dependent action even if the rule calling for support didn't mention objection.

bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:30:05 +0000, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 21 Jan 2009, at 17:07, <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I change the motnw to: "This nweek's regularly scheduled emergency has been pre-empted in order to bring you sanity. Tune in next nweek when we'll
bring you two emergencies."
can't do that immediately

Well, I did. You can submit a Consultation alleging that I violated the

spoon-business mailing list