Re: [s-b] [s-d] motnw

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I submit a consultation, "Did the motnw change today?" with an argument {

"To perform a dependent action, a Player must first announce their 
intent to perform that action as a Game Action. Between 2 and 4 ndays 
after the intent was announced, the action may be performed by the 
Player if..."

Even though in this case the motnw rule does not care about objections, 
the 2-to-4-nday waiting period still applies.
}

In fact, the final paragraph of 5E11, "All Players may Object or Support 
an action before it is performed as a Game Action," suggests that 
objections may be filed and prevent the dependent action even if the 
rule calling for support didn't mention objection.



bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:30:05 +0000, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
> > On 21 Jan 2009, at 17:07, <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >     
> > > I change the motnw to: "This nweek's regularly scheduled emergency  
> > > has been
> > > pre-empted in order to bring you sanity.  Tune in next nweek when  
> > > we'll
> > > bring you two emergencies."
> > >       
> > can't do that immediately
> >     
>
> Well, I did. You can submit a Consultation alleging that I violated the
> rules.
>   


_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business