Re: [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, I wasn't even the Priest for this Consultation. Never mind.

On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> As priest for this Consultation, (I hope I'm not too late,) I Answer it
> TRUE. Reasoning:
>
> { When ehird forfeited no rule specifies that his mack was destroyed. The
> mack was owned by the Player ehird, which no longer exists. Therefore the
> mack is not owned by anybody. That is the same as saying that the mack is
> owned by Nobody. Even though Rule 29 (Mackerel) says that only Legal
> Entities can own mackerel, and Nobody is not a legal entity, this rule is
> not violated because Nobody does not exist. "Nobody owns mack" means "Not a
> body owns mack" means "A body does not own mack." Simple common sense says
> that Nobody can own mack without anybody owning mack. So who owns the (still
> existent) mack now? Nobody.
>
>   On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Ehird wants to know what happened to eir mackerel. I think they're
>> gone, but the rules don't make this happen explicitly, so why not use
>> the judgment system to find out? I submit the following Consultation:
>>
>> {Are there any Mackerel formerly owned by ehird?}
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  -Tyler
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business