Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:01:15 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187

On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Warrigal
> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Charles Schaefer
> <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Answer: NO.
> > Reasoning: The rules are silent on this matter, so I will legislate from
> the
> > bench. When a player forfeits, their mackerel cease to exist. The answer
> to
> > this specific consultation arguably would have been YES if ehird had
> > transferred any mackerel to anyone since the era reset, but I can find no
> > evidence that he did so.
> I claim this to be CONSISTENT. If the rules are silent, the matter has
> to be decided one way or the other.

I claim the Answer to be INCONSISTENT. If neither YES nor NO is appropriate,
there is always PARADOX.

spoon-business mailing list