| Charles Schaefer on Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:29:26 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Edit consultation... |
2008/12/19, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:59 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx > >wrote: > > > >> I resubmit my consultation as follows: > >> > >> The e-mail entitled "ram" (sent by ehird) is spam. ehird is therefore in > >> contravention of Rule 58. > >> I name ehird as the unbeliever. > >> > >> /* I'm not actually asking for a punishment, just that spamming be > >> discouraged. I personally view the e-mail ehird sent as spam. I'm sure > he > >> holds a different opinion, and I respect that. I would just prefer it if > >> spamming doesn't detract from anyone's enjoyment of the game. */ > > > > > > This is Consultation 172. I assign it to Priest Charles. Answer: YES. As punishment, I assign a nominal FINE of m10 in the hope that it will both discourage (even accidental) spamming and encourage people to use a little more caution when sending out emails. Not part of the reasoning just a random comment: I can't find the section in the rules that makes dead bum prisoners ineligible to vote. -- > Charles Schaefer _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business