| Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:37:28 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] (no subject) |
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:33 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I submit a consultation: > "The e-mail entitled "ram" is spam, and is therefore in contravention of > Rule 58. > "True or False" > I ZOT this Consultation because submitting a statement along with "true or false" fit really really awkwardly into the "is <statement> true?" framework that is in the current rule. I invite the Supplicant to resubmit this Consultation as a sentence, and also to directly ask whether or not ehird (whom you may want to name as unbeliever) contravened Rule 58. As it is currently phrased (referring to the message rather than to the alleged offender), I'm not conviced that it could possibly result in a punishment (if that's what you're after). Oracle BP _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business