Re: [s-b] Proposal: Squaredness is mandatory

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Craig Daniel wrote:
> If you stay Unsquared forever, you can't get hurt. Ergo, I submit the
> following proposal.
>
> {In rule 5E48, replace the text {An Unsquared Player can set their
> Resident Square as a Game Action, within the boundaries of (-100,100)
> to (100,100).} with the text {An Unsquared Player can set their
> Resident Square as a Game Action to any Square whose coordinates are
> both in the range from -100 to 100. A player can, as a game action
> with two support, cause an Unsquared player's Resident Square to be
> set to a random square whose coordinates are both within the range
> from -50 to 50; the random determination is to be made at the time
> this action is taken rather than at the time intent is declared.}
>
> In rule 5E48, replace the text {It is a violation of the rules to
> cause a Square to have more than 3 Residents.} with {It is a violation
> of the rules to cause a Square to have more than 3 Residents, except
> by randomly assigning an Unsquared Player to that Square.}}
>
>  - teucer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   
540.

--
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business