Warrigal on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:03:36 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] The obligatory Consultation


On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following Consultation: {There is a Player that is not a Bum.}
>
> My arguments: Because ownership is undefined, nobody has less than 50
> macks, because undefined is not less than 50 macks; therefore, no
> player is a Bum.

Further arguments: It's obviously better for the game if there are no
Bums than if everyone is a Bum. Therefore, a ruling of TRUE is better.

--Warrigal
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business