Craig Daniel on Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:45:51 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] [Emergency] PEPs |
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22 Nov 2008, at 13:20, Elliott Hird wrote: > >> Can't if 2a is correct. > > Or just 2. ...you're right. In case of case two: My in-game projection intends, without objection, to activate the following tweak: {This is the version of the gamestate in which scenario 2b from the above analysis is correct. /* Note: this is different from making it correct, which would still be ambiguous depending on which other one had been right before.*/} (As for scenario 2a - that means the game is completely dead, and it's thus worth ignoring the possibility even though it's real.) _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business