Re: [s-b] Here, have a ballot:

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Below are Billy Pilgrim's votes. My Contract (Vote Tote) will automatically
cause (caused?) me to vote thus. Then at 23:56 UTC on nday 12 of this nweek
I will vote AGAINST 520, 521, and 522, effectively changing my vote.

520 would be a mistake, because there are no paragraphs e or f in Rule 88.
Thus the Mad Scientist would be forced to do something impossible. 521 is
just silly then. 522 is too extreme for my taste. Are we going to let the
inactive players get killed off? The historical rules and consultations?
Erase our history from the record? Eh, it'll be fun though, if it passes.
(Maybe)

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> I vote like so:
>
> 512: Dust off the shelf {{FOR}}
> 513: PD Reform {{FOR}}
> 514: MathFlag {{FOR}}
> 515: Currency Fix {{AGAINST}} [[hadn't read carefully before, but I no see
> that it confuddles much of its attribute-speak. Balance attributes,
> mackerel
> attributes, etc.]]
> 516: Bring Back Some Victory Conditions {{FOR}}
> 517: The Responsibility in Government Spending Act {{FOR}}
> 518: Style Edit {{FOR}}
> 519: Radical Cleanup {{AGAINST}} [[I'd support some PARTS of this...]]
> 520: Monstrous Reset {{FOR}}
> 521: Monstrous Reset, RSPCA edition {{FOR}} [[it doesn't conflict with 520
> or anything, and it's just a subset of it... i don't see why some (minority
> of) people were voting for 520 but against 521.]]
> 522: The Plague {{FOR}}
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>  _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business