Jay Campbell on Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:13:46 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-b] Emancipation |
I submit this consultation: Question: Is J a party to the Baby Blue Corporation contract? Unbeliever: J Reasoning: The Baby Blue contract specifies, "Any member of this contract which does not hold at least one XXX sock ceases to be a member of this contract." To be a "member of" this contract is semantically equivalent to being a "party to" it. I should be removed as a party to the Baby Blue and Brick Red contracts. As part of the Oracularity, I ask to be removed as a party to Black Corporation as well, barring objection from its other Sockholders, saving them a motion and vote. [ if you don't buy it, at least you can't blame me for trying ] [ btw who wrote the initial text of those contracts - what was the intent there, actually joining the contract, or declaring membership that only existed "on paper" ? this is the source of my mistake, obviously ] _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business