Jay Campbell on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:29:27 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Retirement


You're absolutely right. I correct my Answer to be True, Charles is the 
only player with a baby blue sock. I got flipped around dealing with the 
fact the other socks still exist, just not by any other *players*.

Tyler wrote:
> Um, is it just me, or did j just declare that Charles is NOT the only Player
> with a Baby Blue Sock, and then explain with his reasoning just the
> opposite?
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>> I Answer this Consultation as False.
>>
>> Sock creation and destruction are explicitly delegated to Sock
>> Corporations. The socks of forfeit players still exist, and public
>> displays should be updated to reflect these socks not owned by a Legal
>> Entity.
>>
>> [ Given "Any member of this contract which does not hold at least one
>> XXX sock ceases to be a member of this contract," Charles is the only
>> Voting Stockholder left in those two corps. ]
>>
>> Charles Schaefer wrote:
>>     
>>> 2008/10/6, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> I assign this Consultation to the number 130, or assign to this
>>>> Consultation
>>>> the number 130, whichever works. I assign Priest j to this Consultation,
>>>>         
>> or
>>     
>>>> vice versa, whichever works. I can't remember which one is assigned to
>>>> which. I'll get my PD updated when Charles submits some arguments, or
>>>> sooner.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Charles Schaefer <
>>>>         
>> chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx
>>     
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> As the only other sockholder of the two involved corporations, I would
>>>>> really like to find out what happened to these socks.
>>>>>
>>>>> I submit the following consultation:
>>>>> At the time of submission of this consultation, is the player named
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Charles
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> the only player with a Baby Blue sock?
>>>>> Unbeliever: Tyler
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>> Socks are Game Objects with an attribute "Sockholder". That attribute has
>>>       
>> a
>>     
>>> Default Value of "XXX Corporation". According to Rule 4E11, the game
>>> definition of "Default Value" is more or less equivilent to "initial
>>>       
>> value".
>>     
>>> Nowhere do the rules specify that attributes return to their default
>>>       
>> value
>>     
>>> when the current value cannot be determined. Game precedent is that when
>>>       
>> a
>>     
>>> player forfeits, their objects are destroyed.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business