| Jay Campbell on Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:29:27 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [s-d] Retirement |
You're absolutely right. I correct my Answer to be True, Charles is the only player with a baby blue sock. I got flipped around dealing with the fact the other socks still exist, just not by any other *players*. Tyler wrote: > Um, is it just me, or did j just declare that Charles is NOT the only Player > with a Baby Blue Sock, and then explain with his reasoning just the > opposite? > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I Answer this Consultation as False. >> >> Sock creation and destruction are explicitly delegated to Sock >> Corporations. The socks of forfeit players still exist, and public >> displays should be updated to reflect these socks not owned by a Legal >> Entity. >> >> [ Given "Any member of this contract which does not hold at least one >> XXX sock ceases to be a member of this contract," Charles is the only >> Voting Stockholder left in those two corps. ] >> >> Charles Schaefer wrote: >> >>> 2008/10/6, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> >>>> I assign this Consultation to the number 130, or assign to this >>>> Consultation >>>> the number 130, whichever works. I assign Priest j to this Consultation, >>>> >> or >> >>>> vice versa, whichever works. I can't remember which one is assigned to >>>> which. I'll get my PD updated when Charles submits some arguments, or >>>> sooner. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Charles Schaefer < >>>> >> chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx >> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> As the only other sockholder of the two involved corporations, I would >>>>> really like to find out what happened to these socks. >>>>> >>>>> I submit the following consultation: >>>>> At the time of submission of this consultation, is the player named >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Charles >>>> >>>> >>>>> the only player with a Baby Blue sock? >>>>> Unbeliever: Tyler >>>>> >>>>> >>> Socks are Game Objects with an attribute "Sockholder". That attribute has >>> >> a >> >>> Default Value of "XXX Corporation". According to Rule 4E11, the game >>> definition of "Default Value" is more or less equivilent to "initial >>> >> value". >> >>> Nowhere do the rules specify that attributes return to their default >>> >> value >> >>> when the current value cannot be determined. Game precedent is that when >>> >> a >> >>> player forfeits, their objects are destroyed. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> spoon-discuss mailing list >>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-business mailing list >> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business